Skip to main content
Monthly Archives

February 2016

An army of data joined the war on poverty

By Feature, Leadership

By Andrew Keatts, Kinder Institute for Urban Research for The HuffPost Impact |

For all the resources and attention paid to combating poverty, the whole endeavor suffers from relatively limited data.

A new measure that debuted this fall aims to correct that problem.

Researchers at Indiana University’s Lilly Family School of Philanthropy partnered with Salvation Army to develop the Human Needs Index, a real-time measure of poverty that they hope will better inform both policy makers and service providers of the true on-the-ground needs of poor Americans.

Button Text

New nonprofit job board launch next week

By Uncategorized

The Charitable Advisors team is excited about upgrading its Nonprofit Job Board. The change will take place early next week, and we want you to be prepared. The primary change in the new system is that both employers and job seekers will have on-line accounts to help make the job search and candidate review process easier.

In 2015, nonprofit employers posted nearly 1,000 nonprofit job openings on the Central Indiana Nonprofit Job Board. Many nonprofit employers tell us that we are their #1 source to find and hire new employees.

On Monday, Charitable Advisors’ Nonprofit Job Board will upgrade to the latest version from our vendor, ExactHire. Employers will still post ads by e-mailing to ads@notforprofitnews.com and job seekers will still find job openings using newsletter links or by clicking “Nonprofit Job Board” on the website home page at www.CharitableAdvisors.com .

Job advertisers –

  • What changes? – Each employer’s designated contact will have an account set up by Kristen that will provide easy, on-line access of all applicants for the advertised position. This will eliminate employer e-mails for each applicant. Employers still have the option to link job seekers directly to their websites or internal job boards.

Job seekers –

  • What’s the same? – Job seekers still are able to view all job postings at no cost and without any login. Job postings in the newsletter will link to the specific job. Alternately all postings can be accessed by going to CharitableAdvisors.com and clicking on “Nonprofit Job Board” at any time. Job board postings will be updated multiple times each week.
  • What changes? – When an applicant is ready to apply for a position, he or she will be asked to set up an account with a password. Each time he or she applies for a position, it will require a login to his or her account to apply. There are two primary benefits to this new process – 1) job seekers will not need to input basic contact information with each application, and 2) the system will keep a record of all the positions/employers for personal reference.

If you experience problems or have questions, we encourage job seekers to reach out to Julie at Julie@CharitableAdvisors.com and employers to correspond with Kristen at: Ads@NotforProfitNews.com. Charitable Advisors will develop an FAQ for future reference.

Discovering the strength of your philanthropy culture

By Sponsor Insight

By Stefanie Krievins, coach and founder, Radiancy Coaching Partners |

According to a recent Compass Point nationwide survey, half of all development directors anticipate leaving their current jobs in less than two years. This is coupled with 25 percent of executive directors reporting that they fired their last development director.

The survey also concludes that an underlying cause is development directors are feeling solely responsible for the organization’s fundraising. Expectations are not aligned across the organization when it comes to raising the money needed to successfully deliver the mission.

The secret to high-performing organizations is that responsibility is shared between the board, the executive director, the development director and all staff.

Here are five key questions that the board, executive director, and development director can ask to ensure that the organization is creating a high-performing development function:

  • What is the realistic capacity of our organization’s development staff and the technology we use to manage donors and donations?
  • Beyond the development director, who is soliciting directly and serving as an ambassador for the organization?
  • How is philanthropy and fundraising valued across the organization?
  • Is the development director a true key leader in the nonprofit’s organizational planning and strategy?
  • Are we treating people (donors, staff, and volunteers) as people and not just revenue sources or resources for the mission?

Here’s a sixth question: What does it reveal when these roles compare their responses?

The Compass report had some troubling statistics that points to the revolving door in our development functions. While Central Indiana has some fantastic philanthropic resources, we see the 18-to-24 month development director turnover, too. As a donor, I receive no individualized connection for most of my gifts.

There are some steps all organizations can take to support the development function AND the development director. Coaching is one tool to help fix this situation.

Fundraising employees and leadership can benefit from coaching in a variety of ways:

  • Finding focus for an individual development team member
  • Managing for accountability and follow through
  • Understanding communication and work styles individually and as a team
  • Supporting employees to determine what they need to be satisfied and successful in their jobs

Specifically, career coaching can help development directors land their ideal job, one that matches their skills with their compassion and that they can stay in long enough to have a significant impact.

Let’s keep asking the hard questions.

There are many factors that cause disengagement, unhappiness and ineffectiveness in the development director role.

I want to hear your thoughts. In the month of February, my colleague, Jeremy Hatch, a national fundraising consultant, and I will be discussing the predicament of development departments.


stefanie Stefanie Krievins is the founder, coach and trainer at Radiancy Coaching Partners. She has a master’s degree in nonprofit management from SPEA at Indiana University, completed credentialed coaching training from Erickson International, and has more than a decade of employment and volunteering in the charitable sector in Central and Southern Indiana and nationwide. She lives in a low-income neighborhood in Indianapolis as a way to stay connected to the causes she’s most passionate about: homelessness, food insecurity and helping each person get the resources he/she needs to be their most joyful self.

[content_box box_type=”normal”]

“James” was a client who found the specific mission and role where he could contribute to the culture of philanthropy. When we first started working together he knew that helping kids was where he wanted to focus his career, but that’s a pretty broad scope for a job. He was already in a role where the organization helped kids, but in an indirect way, and felt stressed and unfilled. Everything seemed like an uphill battle.

His role for the nonprofit was extremely broad (annual fund, major gifts, marketing, special events, etc., etc.) and the organization wasn’t investing much in their fundraising beyond this one position. In essence, fundraising was just the job of the development director and it got done by hosting special events.

We worked together for a couple of months so he could determine that helping educate kids was the specific mission he wanted to be part of. He also wanted a more specific role that focused on corporate philanthropy or major gifts. It was an easy, “Yes,” when he interviewed for and was offered a job focusing on major gifts that funded international children’s education and healthcare.

[/content_box]

Framing: the art and science

By Feature, Legislation, Programming

By Lynn Sygiel, editor, Charitable Advisors |

In 2012, a staggering 46.5 million people were living in poverty in the United States — the largest number in the 54 years the U.S. Census has measured poverty. This figure has increased or held steady for 11 of the past 12 years.

The reasons are varied, but one contributing factor resonates: Over the same period of time, incomes have stagnated or declined. And with more people earning less, the need for human services has increased, while funding for these services has not.

So what’s a hard-working social service agency or nonprofit to do?

Irv Katz, the former president of United Way of Central Indiana, has spent his career in the human service field. He is now interim president of the National Human Service Assembly (NHSA), a Washington, D.C.-based association of more than 80 of the largest national nonprofit human service organizations.

Katz believes nonprofits have to somehow change the narrative, and change the mindset of funders — both government and private — that social services are a “need” instead of simply a “want.”

In recent years, Katz has witnessed the increase in need, but he also realized that the arguments for services were ineffective and falling on deaf ears. As Congress moved to support one program, nonprofits were asked to recommend another to be cut.

“It started happening about five years ago, where the public policy council of the National Assembly recognized that nobody had any positive legislation going forward. We were just fighting to keep funding levels at best, but it was really being cut, time and time again,” said Katz.

“We’re dying a death by a thousand cuts, and we need to do something different. We need to get people’s attention in a way that citizens can go, ‘Wait a second, I believe in this,’” he said.

Katz believes current communication practices were achieving diminishing returns. So the choice was either to change course or become irrelevant. His group chose the former and is now dipping its toes into the waters of science and psychology with a concept called framing.

Katz’s group became aware of framing and the work of neuroscientists’ work to understand the brain’s architecture. What neuroscientists had learned was that new concepts as initially understood are fixed in an individual’s brain and information pertaining to the concept is viewed through that frame. Scientists also have learned that changing that initial frame is difficult.

For example, a widely held view is that funding for human services is charity. Namely, if there is enough money to go around, that’s fine. But if not, such programs are expendable. Katz is working to change that perception.

“We quite frankly thought that reframing might be a pathway out of the issues that human services were facing — the lack of recognition, the lack of attention, the lack of understanding,” said Katz. “We’re not building a frame by consensus, we’re building it based on research. So we actually went out looking for framing experts.”

Enter the Kresge Foundation and a planning grant. The idea resonated with the foundation because it had actually started a similar dialogue with grantees. In 2013, the National Human Services Assembly contracted with The FrameWorks Institute and began by researching the public’s perception.

“The research that the FrameWorks Institute really identified is that there is a huge gap between public perception and the understanding of people in the human services field. The public tended to think the individual was the cause of the problem, and the individual is responsible for addressing the problem. The experts tended to see that there was more of a societal context. These also included the very significant structural aspect, that it was literally not the individual in terms of causes and solutions and responsibility. And that’s just huge,” said Katz.

The Annie E. Casey Foundation joined in supporting this effort and together the foundations have not only supported the NHSA’s work, but helped fund a re-framing tool kit. In November, Building a New Narrative on Human Services was released. It includes a collection of framing research, recommendations, and sample communications designed to help explain the importance of human services.

While the tool kit is new, Katz is hopeful it will change the conversation.

“Hopefully people will realize this is a new and better way to talk about this whole enterprise of humans helping one another thrive,” said Katz. “I’ve been really pleased and amazed that the wonderful and positive reception that we’ve gotten almost everywhere we’ve gone,” said Katz.

NHSA is beginning to share the narrative and tool kit in workshops with state and local human services coalitions and national entities. Marketing and public policy leaders Assembly members will be introduced to the tool kit at scheduled workshops at sessions with their peers.

2016 workplace trends

By Sponsor Insight

By Paul Ashley, Advisor, FirstPerson  |

Each fall, FirstPerson’s team gets together to identify workplace trends we see emerging for the coming year.

Benefits are an ever-changing field and engaging employees from various generations is challenging to many employers.

Watch the short video here to hear from CEO Bryan Brenner and me about the 2016 workplace trends we see emerging or read the transcript.

Button Text

Poverty more relevant for childhood obesity

By Feature

By Vanessa Rancano, freelance journalist, NPR |

As researchers have searched for ways to explain the childhood obesity epidemic in the U.S., many have posited that a child’s race or ethnicity alone can put them at greater risk of becoming overweight or obese.

Kim Eagle, a professor of internal medicine and health management and policy at the University of Michigan, was skeptical of this thinking. His hunch was that poverty was a much more important part of the equation.

And he saw an opportunity to parse the connections between childhood obesity, poverty and race in Massachusetts, where public health officials have been collecting race, body mass index and other data on about 112,000 students from about 70 of the state’s school districts. Eagle and colleagues decided to compare those data to students’ eligibility for free school lunch programs, an indicator of poverty, to find out what predicts whether a child might become overweight or obese.

Button Text

Framing public issues

By Feature, Leadership

By staff, FrameWorks Institute |

The FrameWorks Institute works with nonprofit groups and philanthropic foundations to document how the American public understands various social issues and how nonprofit communicators can frame the public discourse on those issues to advance policy outcomes.

To do this, it has developed an approach called strategic frame analysis (SFA), a new way of thinking about communications that FrameWorks believes is especially relevant to the types of social issues addressed by workshop participants. These tools are designed to inspire new thinking and new techniques among

policy experts and advocates who seek to resolve social problems – whether for children and families in a particular state or for the global environment.

Button Text

Reframing issues in the digital age

By Feature, Leadership

By Julie Sweetland and Rob Shore, FrameWork Institute, Nonprofit Quarterly |

One of a social advocate’s most critical acts is to frame an issue. In framing, a communicator uses language, metaphor, and other means to bring the community into the issue in a particular way.

So, for instance, tobacco control advocates reframed tobacco from a “personal vice” narrative, in which the public discourse centered around individual choice and behavior, to a “defective product” narrative, in which the role of corporate malfeasance and the need for protective regulations became clear.

Reframing an issue is hard work, as frames are socially shared and persist over time; but it is worth it, because public opinion and policy preferences are frame dependent. The stories nonprofit communicators tell have the power to make the public more or less supportive of positive changes — for instance, in the way we support human health and well-being, distribute society’s resources, and redress long-standing injustices.

Button Text