Skip to main content
Monthly Archives

June 2015

Good intentions or intentionality: Which describes your board of directors?

By Governance, Leadership, Sponsor Insight

By Steve Sauer, senior manager, BKD |

Most historians agree the form and function of today’s board of directors began around the advent of the 20th century. English authorities decided the ultimate authority in a company was vested in the board of directors, and the nature and extent of its authority was to be enumerated in the articles of association (or incorporation).

So after 100 years of practice, these boards have evolved into exceptional governing bodies presiding over their organizations … right? Not exactly.

According to a January 2015 study conducted by BoardSource, boards of not-for-profit organizations are not as close as they think to achieve the pinnacle of effective governance. On the contrary, the study reveals that, on average, not-for-profit leaders give boards a B- in overall performance. It would appear, then, that in our age of constant political, economic, regulatory and demographic changes, significant improvements are necessary — even vital to the health of the not-for-profit sector as a whole.

BoardSource, a 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to advancing the public good by building exceptional not-for-profit boards and inspiring board service, supports, trains and educates more than 100,000 not-for-profit board leaders from across the country each year.

Button Text

Salaried workers could get overtime pay

By Feature, Governance, Leadership

By Katie Johnston, Boston Globe staff |

Millions of American workers who put in extra hours with no extra pay would soon be eligible for overtime under a plan unveiled Monday night by President Obama. The proposed regulations would more than double the current threshold at which many salaried employees stop getting overtime pay, covering those who make up to $50,440 a year.

That is welcome news for workers like Gassan Marzuq. As the manager of a Dunkin’ Donuts in Kingston, Gassan Marzuq sometimes worked 80 or 90 hours a week — spending most of his days serving coffee, running the cash register, and mopping the floors.

Yet because he was a salaried employee who had been deemed ineligible for overtime, his $825 a week in pay sometimes averaged out to roughly the same hourly rate his workers were paid — a reality for many managers when they work more than 40 hours a week.

The Obama administration’s proposal, revealed in an op-ed by the president on the Huffington Post Monday night and set to be officially announced Tuesday, would extend overtime protections to roughly 5 million workers in 2016.

In 1975, about 62 percent of the salaried workforce were eligible for overtime pay, according to the Economic Policy Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank that advocates for low-income workers. Today, because of inflation, 8 percent are covered.

Button Text

Views

By Feature, Governance, Leadership

By Zac Kester, executive director, Charitable Allies |

After reviewing the U.S. Department of Labor’s proposed changes, I believe that this would have a significant adverse effect on the budgets and operations of small nonprofits, especially those who currently pay their executive directors (or an equivalent position) and administrative support staff less than the new thresholds.

The Department of Labor fact sheets 17C, 17B and 17A outline the requirements for the exemption that allows employers to NOT pay executive and administrative employees overtime. Among other things, those requirements are that employees make at least $23,660.

Many small nonprofits pay staff on a salary basis and do not pay overtime. With the new standards, which will move this threshold to somewhere between $42,000 and $52,000, any employee who makes below that threshold would be entitled to overtime, regardless if they otherwise met the test and qualified for the exemption. Many nonprofit organizations employ people in this range ($23,660 to $42,000/$52,000).

If this regulation is adopted, nonprofit managers and boards will have to be careful to monitor their employees’ time and pay them overtime wages to which they will be entitled.

Button Text

DIY: Make a bylaws cheat sheet

By Feature, Governance

By Jan Masaoka, director and editor-in-chief, Blue Avocado |

“What does it say in the bylaws?”

“Does anyone have a copy of the by-laws?”

“I know I got one when I started on the board but . . . ”

Here’s a new idea: a bylaws cheat sheet. Even if there is a copy of the by-laws handy, it’s tedious to have to look over all the legalese when you want an answer to a simple question. So a nice 30-minute Do It Yourself (DIY) project is to create one.

Button Text

Starting a nonprofit: five tips and a warning

By Feature, Leadership

By editorial staff, Idealist |

The world is in the midst of what one observer has called an “associational revolution.” New nonprofits are being formed for every sort of purpose on every continent at the fastest rate in history. If you are thinking of joining this vast worldwide movement by starting — or helping to start — a nonprofit, here are some crucial things to think about.

Tip #1: All nonprofits are local. Even the globe-spanning, household-name organizations that operate in hundreds or thousands of places must learn about, and live with, complicated rules that differ greatly from place to place. Almost certainly, the second thing you will do when starting a nonprofit is to register with the local government agency that handles new “nongovernmental organizations” in the community where the organization will operate.

Button Text

Advice from the pros

By Feature, Leadership

By Lynn Sygiel, editor, Charitable Advisors |

Been there, done that. In any endeavor, experience goes a long way. In the Indianapolis’ nonprofit world, wisdom is in no short supply, particularly from longtime executives. Many have seen changes in the field over the course of their careers.

Recently, at the request of Charitable Advisors, five retired nonprofit high-profile executives participated in a roundtable discussion about their careers and shared advice for new nonprofit executives. Participants were:

  • Ellen Annala, former Central Indiana United Way president, spent 23 years with the organization and retired in 2013 after 15 years as president. Her career was spent working for Indianapolis nonprofits.
  • Betsy Bikoff spent the first 25 years of her career working for-profits and then was the first employee of the Fairbanks Foundation. She was its chief grantmaking officer and vice president until the end of last year. Early this year, she launched Betsy Bikoff Consulting.
  • Willis Bright spent 25 years at Lilly Endowment as director of youth programming before retiring in 2012. Currently, he is president of Bright Visions.
  • Hoagland Elliott, CEO for Raphael Health Center for the past decade, also served as chair of Indiana Primary Health Care Association.
  • Jim McClelland retired in April after 41 years at the helm of Goodwill.

Habitat for Humanities of Greater Indianapolis hosted the hour-and-a-half roundtable conversation. The executives’ insights will be featured in a series of stories in the next month. This week, we feature these former leaders’ advice for new nonprofit executives. These are the highlights:

WILLIS BRIGHT: I think my advice to an executive director is first of all, know thyself and be passionate about wanting to be an executive director and be clear about the kind of staff you and your board need to achieve the impact that you want in the community.

HOAGLAND ELLIOTT: My advice would be to really believe in your mission and act on it. I think many times it gets left in the drawer. Treat your clients with respect. People who are disadvantaged need more respect than others.

JIM McCLELLAND: I would add understanding your context, understanding where you fit in the communities you’re operating in, where you fit in the fields you’re engaged in and how what you’re doing relates to what others around you are doing. Don’t develop tunnel vision.

ELLEN ANNALA: I’d probably just underscore again the importance of getting it right with your board. Figuring out how to make that work so that’s it’s working for your mission.

Another piece of advice is actually something I learned from watching Goodwill. I remember when I was at Big Sisters thinking when you’re smaller you’re more nimble, and you can turn on a dime. Well, you can’t, because when you’re smaller, it’s real easy to get consumed by survival. I watched you (McClelland) be the nimble one that was able to turn on a dime.

I remember when a contract got pulled, and Goodwill turned right, and part of it was it had the resources to do that.

McCLELLAND: I so agree with you on the nimbleness. If you want to succeed over time, you’ve got to have impact and you have got to know what that impact is. You’ve got to be sustainable; if you’re constantly struggling to keep your head above water, you cannot do a good job of accomplishing your mission. You need a certain level of financial strength if you are going to do the job. The third is the adaptability. You’ve got to be able to adapt quickly and effectively as new needs and opportunities arise, and as the external environment changes. All three of those are absolutely essential over time.

BRIGHT: Jim, you said something earlier that I think is so critical. You talked about your engagement with your colleagues around the country, and finding out what they’re doing, maybe bringing some things back. Part of the tunnel vision that folks get into is just thinking about what they are doing — never even asking folks across town, executives across the street. They especially need those ideas from folks who are doing what you are doing somewhere else. Call somebody else.

BETSY BIKOFF: That’s what my advice was going to be. Go to school on other people, whether it’s next door, across the city. There is always somebody else like your nonprofit somewhere. There are other foundations, other nonprofits, other leaders whom you can ask. Somebody else has probably already invented what you are doing.

McCLELLAND: But not necessarily only in your field. There’s a quote in one of Gary Hamel’s books that says most people in an industry are blind in the same way. They’re all paying attention to the same things, and not paying attention to the same things. You have got to broaden your perspective. Learn, learn, learn, where you can. You’ve got to get outside your own arena, if you’re really going to grow and learn.

BIKOFF: Talk with people outside your age group. If you only talk with people in your own age band, you’re not going to get the other kinds of thinking.

McCLELLAND: And that’s older and younger.

BRIGHT: Borrow freely.

GIVING USA 2015 annual report on philanthropy – analysis

By Feature

Join JGA as we delve into the latest release of Giving USA: The Annual Report on Philanthropy and uncover what the data says about the state of fundraising and donor trends. We’ll be joined by Patrick Rooney, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Research with the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, who leads the Giving USA research team. Patrick and Angela White, Senior Consultant and CEO of Johnson, Grossnickle and Associates, will help you dig into the trends behind the data in the June 2015 release. You will hear from the experts what these trends mean and how to interpret the numbers and understand their impact on your advancement efforts.

Button Text

Nonprofit startups are just like their counterparts

By Feature, Sustainability

By Sarah E. Needleman, reporter, The Wall Street Journal |

What’s different about building a successful for-profit and nonprofit startup?

Not much, according to Paul Graham, founder of Y Combinator, an elite accelerator program in Mountain View, Calif., that accepted a nonprofit for the first time this month, Watsi.org. “You could never tell there was a nonprofit mixed in,” he said in a phone interview on Friday.

Watsi, a medical crowdfunding platform that launched in August, is among 47 startup businesses in the latest Y Combinator class. Past graduates of the competitive three-month program include DropBox, Reddit and Airbnb.

Mr. Graham began thinking about inviting nonprofits to join Y Combinator about a year ago. “I was talking to a friend who wanted to do a nonprofit project and I realized I was giving exactly the same advice I’d be giving to a startup,” he said.

Button Text

A social entrepreneur transforms nonprofit to profit-making

By Feature, Sustainability

By Esha Chhabra, contributor, The New York Times |

In 2013, The New York Times published a case study about a social entrepreneur, Saul Garlick, discussing what kind of legal structure would be best for his enterprise, ThinkImpact, which encourages entrepreneurship in third-world communities. He fundamentally had three options: continue as a nonprofit, go commercial, or find some sort of hybrid route.

The Times asked three experts which option would be best. Pamela Hartigan, director of the Skoll Center for Social Entrepreneurship at Oxford, who is constantly advising aspiring social entrepreneurs, suggested that Mr. Garlick hop off the “treadmill of donor dependency.” Jonathan Lewis, a lecturer at the University of California, Berkeley, and a social entrepreneur himself, also suggested going commercial. Lastly, Shivani Siroya, an entrepreneur who runs InVenture, a hybrid organization, noted that it was possible to raise revenue even as a nonprofit and thus suggested that ThinkImpact should not dismiss a nonprofit model too quickly.

Many commenters agreed with Ms. Siroya, suggesting that Mr. Garlick use revenue streams as a nonprofit to raise money rather than going purely commercial. Others, however, noted that the nonprofit field is evolving and a profit-making enterprise can be driven by social impact and not the bottom line. Several readers pointed to new legal structures like a benefit corporation or L3C, which incorporate social impact into the core mission of a company. The Times contacted Mr. Garlick for a follow-up conversation, which has been condensed and edited, to see which option he chose.

Button Text

HR outsourcing: How can it work

By Leadership, Sponsor Insight

By Jeremy York, HR field representative, The Synergy Companies | 

Human resource strategy, also referred to as people strategy, is just as important as an organization’s financial, operational, and business development strategies, because a company needs people to achieve its business goals.

Human resources are an integral part of any business, but many times it is one function that falls by the wayside The problem in addressing an organization’s human resource needs often lies in the lack of time, resources or expertise within a company. Many organizations do not have the resources to dedicate a staff member to the HR function, and require employees to assume the tasks. As an add-on, that limits time that can be spent focusing on HR.

Luckily there is a solution — HR outsourcing. HR outsourcing can provide the human resources support and expertise that organizations need to help drive business.

According to the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), companies outsource HR in order:

to save money — realizing cost savings through efficiency

to focus on strategy — aligning people with mission, vision, values,

to improve compliance — reducing risks through expertise; and

because there is no in-house HR experience — acquiring an expert to lead the way.

HR outsourcing can also help organizations improve accuracy, increasing quality by lessening workloads and by gaining technology advances that they may not have otherwise been able to afford. All can help the organization drive a better bottom line

The most common outsourced HR functions identified by SHRM include both transactional and strategic tasks such as payroll administration, employee benefit administration, training and development and 401K administrations. These are all tasks that can be time consuming and can require advanced skill to ensure compliance with federal, state and local laws. Many organizations find that outsourcing transactional tasks allows staff to focus on more value-added work that links directly to business goals and objectives while outsourcing strategic tasks allows them to acquire the appropriate expertise to execute HR projects successfully.

Options for HR outsourcing

Several options exist for HR outsourcing, but two of the most common are Professional Employer Organizations (PEO) and HR Consultants. PEOs generally manage all components related to employment and HR (payroll, benefits, tax liability, workers compensation, employee relations, compliance, training/development, etc.) and become the administrative employer or employer of record for employees. PEOs are able to leverage buying power to offer a range of HR services, resources, and employee benefits that small employers may not have the financial capabilities to access. This allows employers to spend more time developing and growing the business without the cumbersome task of managing all of the details of the employment relationship.

HR consultants, on the other hand, take a more “a-la-carte” approach in providing their services. They work with businesses of all sizes and projects of all scopes, both tactical and strategic. Typically HR consultants assist with strategically integrating effective HR processes, programs and practices into daily business operations and usually leave management of HR responsibilities to the client. HR consultants function as a vendor or independent contractor and typically per project or “ad hoc” basis.

Selecting an HR outsourcing option

Determining whether you should select a PEO versus a HR consultant doesn’t have to be a difficult task. Honestly, it’s about what is the right fit for your organization. In order to understand what makes the most sense for your business, you’ll want to first conduct a needs analysis asking such questions as:

  • What are you attempting to gain/achieve by outsourcing the HR function?
  • What does the business need to be more efficient in people management and reduce overall HR administration costs?
  • Are you spending too much time on administrative work rather than high-level, business strategy?

Secondly, you will need to evaluate your current processes and resources understanding the answers to questions like:

  • Do you have HR processes, and if so do they align with best practices?
  • Do you have the in-house HR resources, but lack the expertise for certain projects/tasks?
  • Do you currently have the resources and time to devote to people processes and strategy?

And finally, after reflecting on internal capabilities you will need to determine what work to outsource. Ask yourself:

  • Do you want to outsource all large administrative tasks such as payroll, benefits, workers compensation, 401k, etc.?
  • Is the need to outsource projects on an as needed basis — smaller tasks such as recruitment/ selection, background/reference checks, employee training, compensation reviews etc.?

Going through the process above will assist you in determining what option is right for your business so that you can get the right kind of HR partnership to support goals and objectives.

Because the HR function is fundamental to align your people to your processes, you will want to pay special attention not overlook its impact on the bottom line. Inefficient and ineffective people processes, inexperienced people in skilled roles and noncompliance with legal requirements all have a cost. By ensuring you have a strong HR function in place you can help minimize those costs while simultaneously investing in the business.

jeremy-yorkJeremy York, SPHR, SHRM-SCP, is a Human Resources field representative for Synergy PEO Services.  He provides strategic and generalist HR support to local nonprofit organization leaders and their staffs. Jeremy has over 15 years of human resources experience working as a consultant, director of human resources, and generalist, in the insurance, healthcare, nonprofit, PEO, and other industries.  Jeremy has a bachelor’s degree from Purdue University in Organizational Leadership and Supervision and a master’s degree from Indiana Wesleyan University in Management. He is the current director of certification for the Indiana State Council of the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) and serves on the IndySHRM board of directors as the past president.